This applies only to the 1992 Framework Agreement. The 2002 Framework Agreement abolished the first and second methods. In practice, the first method was very rarely chosen, as its use required the financial institutions concerned to report their gross and non-net risk under the framework agreement. The 2002 framework agreement also replaced the distinction between market listing and loss with a single concept, the “close-out amount”. This is determined in relation to each transaction that has been concluded and is, overall, the profit or loss that would result from the conclusion of an equivalent transaction at the time of early termination. The sum of the amounts in the financial statements and unpaid amounts is called the “early cancellation amount”. This is the net amount to be paid from one party to another in respect of completed transactions. The framework contract and the timetable shall determine the reasons why one of the parties may require the conclusion of covered transactions due to the occurrence of a termination event by the other party. Standard termination events include defaults or bankruptcy. Other termination events that can be added to the calendar include a credit degradation below a certain level.
The most important use of compensation is close-out compensation in accordance with Section 6(e) of the ISDA Framework Agreement. According to this section, when terminating an ISDA framework contract (or more specifically ongoing transactions) (normally after a lending event of any kind), the value of each of the completed transactions is assessed (there are several ways to do this, but the most common measure is to determine how much it would cost a party to enter into a transaction whose business terms are identical to the completed transaction. for third parties – this is called the amount of the statement) and converted into termination currency (which should be indicated in the calendar of the isda framework agreement) and all unpaid unpaid. Billing amounts (which may be positive or negative depending on which party is “in cash” with respect to a particular completed transaction) and unpaid amounts (again positive or negative depending on who owes them) are added together and a single digit in the currency of termination is determined by either party to be paid. The applicability of clearing rules is essential for financial institutions operating in the derivatives market, as net capital capacity allows them to allocate capital only against the net amount they would have to pay when concluding an ISDA framework contract and not against the gross amount. . . .